Archives for

Big Brother is (usually) Listening

Homeland security is installing high definition video cameras equipped with audio on busses and transit lines in a few major cities across the United States: San Francisco, Eugene, Hartford, Columbus, Baltimore, and Traverse City, MI.

We’re also seeing devices in subways and trains. I don’t know about you, but I thought my private conversations — even in public places — was protected by our constitution?

Advances in audio technology has made it a viable addition to traditional video surveillance. But is it legal?

U.S. Federal Law states that it is illegal to record audio of another person’s conversation in private if they have not consented to the recording. However, in recent years, courts have often dismissed Fourth Amendment privacy rights and accepted audio evidence collected “illegally.”

By outfitting buses with audio / video devices, Homeland is saying that anywhere you are, outside of your home, is public. And therefore, anything you say, to yourself or another, may be used in court against you.



Read More

Business Allows Police to Access Security Cameras

ABC News recently published an article about the increasing amount of crimes caught on private surveillance cameras, and police interest in connecting to these cameras. In Philadelphia and Washington DC (as well as other states), police are putting together maps of private surveillance cameras. This allows them to quickly search for video evidence at businesses close to where a crime took place.

This is a great opportunity for police departments in any state. If they are relying on private cameras, at least the police won’t have to pay upkeep costs for those devices. The only cost is the cost of retrieving footage from private security cameras, and the cost for investigating the evidence.

However, there are fourth amendment rights at risk here. The news has been full of cases involving audio and video evidence – it’s a topic of discussion that varies by state, because a/v recording laws can be so different. One side of the argument says our privacy is being violated, the other says it’s okay to record if there’s a chance to increase security. What are your thoughts?


Read More